9 Ways Adblock is destroying the web as we know it

Everyone knows that Adblock hurts small publishers and website owners by depriving them of revenue, but the effects of adblocking go far deeper than most people realize. ?And while it’s true that?aggressive ads damage?the user experience of the web, there’s another, far more sinister side to?that coin: ?Here?are a few?ways Adblock use is destroying the web as we know it.

1) Adblocking is forcing independent publishers into the strictly controlled walled-gardens of mega-corporations.

walled-garden-image

As adblocking has cut deeply into website revenues, independent voices are increasingly forced into the pockets of large corporations. We should all be concerned when the?healthy eco-system of small and independent publishers is forced into the pockets of just three primary mega-coporations (Google, Apple and Facebook) which?each exert increasing influence over what we read.

 

2) Adblocking leads to?the introduction of pay-walls which limit free access to content.?

website-pay-wallMany publishers are left with little choice: The overhead costs of writers, photographers, editors, coders and other vital website contributors now often exceeds traditional?advertising-revenue — which for many publishing sectors has?collapsed badly in Adblock’s wake. ?In some countries like Germany, where nearly 40% of the public is now using ad-blockers, the problem is particularly acute. The solution for many publishers is a subscription “pay wall” which prevents free access to content, and requires a paid subscription to view. What was once a free-range of endless free information, is increasingly filled with?pay-walled content.

 

3) Many adblockers block vital tools like Google Analytics.

analytics-illustration?These anonymous data tools reveal no personal information about specific users, but do provide essential information to publishers and webmasters. These tools help site operators to detect problems with sites, improve site performance and respond to usage trends and patterns. A website deprived of this valuable data is more likely to experience technical issues or?to lose touch?with the tastes and usage patterns?of its?visitors.

 

4) Journalistic integrity is the first casualty of native advertising.

journalistic-integrity?”Native advertising”?is the industry’s new darling. This innocent name for advertising stealthily concealed as content (or within it) is hardly going to win many fans among readers after they realize they’ve traded banners for 5 minutes of deceptive advertising dressed-up as “news”. Despite the endless claims by publishers that so-called “native advertising” won’t result in plunging standards of journalism. These claims don’t even come close to passing the basic ‘sniff test’. When advertising masquerades as journalism?to avoid adblocking software, publishers have already sold-out journalistic integrity to advertisers by definition.

For those who haven’t seen John Oliver’s brilliant summation of native advertising — it really can’t be said better than this:

 

5) The technological arms race will ultimately harm the web experience.

armsrace

As I’ve?noted several?times, the technological arms-race is not optional for publishers. Pundits?can cling to unproven answers?like native advertising, acceptable ads?and subscription?models — but we already know that poorly targeted, poorly tracked, marginal, static ads underperform. And we know that subscription models for the vast majority of websites won’t work due to the side-door problem. (Cue the dozens?of responses from ivory tower consultants who don’t directly earn?their?living with web advertising or who don’t understand how brief user engagement typically is). ?It is also irrational to blame publishers for escalating a game of cat-and-mouse which was initiated by adblocking users at the outset. This unavoidable arms race will lead to a?web filled with countermeasures, processor-intensive background scripts, anemic?site-health metrics and a frequently interrupted web-experience.

 

6) Adblocking damages?the delicate eco-system of free media by helping large publishers and harming smaller publishers.

survival-of-the-biggestWe need independent voices. When larger media companies?with larger budgets?can continue to profit in an adblocked world by paying the extortion?fees of “acceptable ads” programs, or by?premium positioning in news aggregators, or by partnering with the largest brands for unique native-advertising campaigns?– smaller?publishers will be left to eke?out a living in?a dwindling?pool?of non-adblocked users. ?This effective culling of the smaller publishers?in the eco-system effectively unwinds what has to-date, been one of the web’s great advantages: ??A diversified landscape with equal accessibility to publishers of all sizes.

 

7) Many adblockers block all ads by default. Not just acceptable ads.

clean-slate?Let’s for a moment ignore?the flimsy, profit-motivated philosophy of AdBlock Plus’ “acceptable ads” program which pretends that users and publishers share?some?common ‘best interest’ of publisher survival — and?instead focus on what web users really want: ?No ads at all. ?As I’ve noted?before, a vast number of users who block ads do not want better ads. ?They want no ads whatsoever. The survival of any one publisher is not particularly concerning to ad blockers who simply want free news. ?Hence, the selling point of many adblockers is that they block everything — not that they block selectively and responsibly.?All the apologetic?ad-industry mea culpas in the world are not going to result in a viable?middle-ground when users are demanding both 100%?free content and 100%?ad-free content.

 

8) Adblocking favors apps over websites.

app-vs-webIn an adblocking world, apps continue to represent an ad-safe zone, while by contrast the web becomes an increasingly?ad-hostile zone. While this might sound like an even trade-off — it isn’t. Content discovery in apps and content discovery on the open web are vastly different things. On the web, we typically start with Search, and often find ourselves hopping from site to site via referring links. Our ability to access information on previously unknown sites is unlimited — and?behavior patterns show that we?frequently visit sites once and only once, never passing the homepage — often never even knowing the name of the site we are visiting. On the open web we?come for information, access it, and often leave forever. Advertising makes the free-web and?this?dynamic possible. Most apps?don’t.

 

9) Adblocking often harms social media sharing.

social-media-icons??Many adblockers like iOS’ Blockr app seek to “reduce the user interface” by removing not only ads, but social media sharing buttons as well. A practice that stunts?potential viral growth via social sharing. As a result, the potential reach of a well written web-article is severely limited. Given that over 30% of site traffic now consists of social-media referrals, the impact to websites from curtailing social media shares should be cause for serious concern.

 

Anyone got more? Please post below in the comments.

 

  • Yuri

    Adblocking turned into a scam the day they started charging publishers millions of dollars to let their ads through. It’s an extortion scheme.

  • David McReary

    AdBlock is also used to block a site’s internal promotions: Email subscription forms etc. Even my charity support promotion got blocked.

  • Jin S

    10) Kills hundreds of thousands of mom & pop businesses which developed in a world where advertising was how you made money on the web. Those businesses took YEARS to build.

  • Bruce DeVry

    10) Kills independent media leaving only mega-publishers standing.

    • ?????

      that was already mentioned in 1 and 6

  • Xavier

    Turned around, it’s more how the long and evolving aggressive advertising and malware injection model has been slowing and destroying the web user experience, leading into the rise and perceived need for adblocking software. If users perceive that ads are loud upon entry, are slowing their webpage draw and tapping bandwidth, what is likely to rise out of the situation when content providers don’t find a less intrusive measure of ad revenue and content presentation is the user doing for themselves by adblockers and script disabling addons.

    Pay gates may be the thing that works best for a dedicated audience and content providers, if their brand and content is worth such. But it’s not a one way street to say adblockers are the sole destructive cause or that users are greedy want all for nothing, or that content providers are all innocents with no other means and measures besides escalation.

  • Giulia Morgendorffer

    “As a result, the potential reach of a well written web-article is severely limited.”

    well, it’s really hard to copy link and paste it on your facebook profile, I understand…gtfo, whoever has built an “empire” on ads deserves to fail and disappear. People doesn’t freakin’ care about ads,

    I don’t mind how many $$$?????? is needed to put your useless ads on “whitelist”, I don’t even think about whitelisting. You’re contradictory anyway, you whine about the cost of being whitelisted and then you admit that people doesn’t want to whitelist at all.

    GO AD-FREE

    PS: obviously I ad-blocked you too, despite your RIDICULOUS antiadblocking system.

  • Silent Hunter

    I blame popups. If ads had stayed as just static banners, I bet no one would have thought of blocking them.

  • Glockenspiel

    Came here just to say that I proudly use adblockers on all of my machines because I’ve lost two desktop computers to ads that were not at all legitimate. One was an ad that had a fake ‘close’ button that when clicked, downloaded shit that clogged up my computer (Still removing hidden downloaded shite from that to this day years later) and the other had to be factory reset after an ad disguised itself as a legitimate software download button. Never again. It’s been proven multiple times that ads are only getting worse, not better.

    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160111/05574633295/forbes-site-after-begging-you-turn-off-adblocker-serves-up-steaming-pile-malware-ads.shtml

    Oh and as for blocking adblockers: not good for your site either from what I can see: https://thestack.com/world/2016/04/21/sites-that-block-adblockers-seem-to-be-suffering/
    My adblockers (yes, more than one) stay on.

  • Chuk

    This strikes me as a case of the business blaming the customer for not supporting them. You’re kind of getting mad at users for being annoyed by ads because they support you, but if the current culture is that users don’t want ads, then you need to find a new business model, not force them on people who don’t want them.

    This is true of any business when the times change and their customers no longer like the current experience, period. It is on the business to adapt, not complain about their customers not giving them money because they deserve to exist on principle (even if they really do deserve to exist on principle).

  • Philipp Jakob

    I’m happy with not having to endure hundreds of mind-sucking ad-banners every day. Adblocking is a reaction to an overwhelming flood of ads. If blocking off this rubbish is considered as immoral and anti-freedom of speech, then you maybe didn’t think your 9-point argumentation through. What’s your point? Should I disable my adblocker and go through ad-hell just to be morally good? This is a very one-dimensional argumentation. What about a paradigm-change? Web 3.0, ad-free, welcome to peace of mind!

  • Scott Fulkerson

    This might be all well and all but for the fact that the major ad servers are propagating confirmed computer viruses and other malware.

  • Anoymous M

    I hate ads because they are very annoying, they propagate harmful viruses and slow down page loading. That is why I use and support ad blockers.

    Let’s make it simple, Mr. BlockAdblock. Times have changed, netizens are really sick and tired of ads, and there are now ways to earn money without forcing ads on your visitors.

    In short, wake up to the truth.

    #ISupportAdBlock